NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
A10M
+924%
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2022
GRID
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
1536
Shading Units
7168
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
