NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
+1873%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1536
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
