Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q +370%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Nov 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
256
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy