NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+59%
3.656 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
May 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU117
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
