NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
+111%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
