NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
+3%
2.369 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
