NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
6864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100B
+12761%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Apr 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
6
6912
Shading Units
48
432
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
400W
TDP
32W
800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1
