NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 512MB VRAM GRID K220Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K220Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100B
+506%
13.89 TFLOPS
GRID K220Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
1536
432
TMUs
128
192
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
225W
800 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
