NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
6464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100A
+1251%
13.89 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Jul 2011
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
14
6912
Shading Units
448
432
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
48
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
238W
800 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
