Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 864.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 148% (2495MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (295W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A
13.89 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +341%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Apr 2023
GRID
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1855 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
6912
Shading Units
6144
432
TMUs
384
192
ROPs
192
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
48 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

400W
TDP
295W
800 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy