NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 604.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1395MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100A
+38%
13.89 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
56
6912
Shading Units
3584
432
TMUs
224
192
ROPs
64
432
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
150W
800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
