Intel GMA X3500 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel GMA X3500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2013
GMA Graphics
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
40
1
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
667.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
5.336 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Bearlake
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
Bearlake (G35)
GPU Variant
-
Generation 4.0
Architecture
Generation 7.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
22 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
