NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (2010MHz vs 1695MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
+167%
32.98 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1335 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
24
9728
Shading Units
3072
304
TMUs
96
112
ROPs
48
304
Tensor Cores
96
76
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
189.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
515.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
32.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
32.98 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
515.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
AD107
GN21-X11
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
