Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

76
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
9728
Shading Units
-
304
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
RV530
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

320W
TDP
Unknown
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy