Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 +510%
48.74 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

76
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
9728
Shading Units
4096
304
TMUs
256
112
ROPs
64
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Capsaicin
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

320W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy