Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9390 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1089MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
Radeon E9390 PCIe +225%
3.903 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
713 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
1089 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
640
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.85 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
122.0 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.903 TFLOPS
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.903 TFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy