Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1594MHz
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +184%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1531 MHz
Base Clock
-
1594 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
19.13 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
1224 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
38.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Amethyst
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy