NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1594MHz vs 1150MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 965M
+92%
2.355 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX330
1060
GeForce GTX 965M
+69%
1800
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX330
126
GeForce GTX 965M
+533%
798
Graphics Card
Feb 2020
Release Date
Jan 2016
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1531 MHz
Base Clock
935 MHz
1594 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
19.13 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1224 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
38.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
GM206S
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
