Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA T600 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA T600 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 40W)
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1395MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
T600 Max Q +213%
2.5 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce MX
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy