Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 860M OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1085MHz vs 1038MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 860M OEM +74%
1.389 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce GTX 860M OEM +45%
105
OctaneBench
GeForce MX250
22
GeForce GTX 860M OEM +50%
33
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
1020 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N15P-GX-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy