NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX130 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (2010MHz vs 1189MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX130
0.913 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1252%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1109 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1189 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.512 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
28.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
913.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
28.54 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
AD107
N16S-GTR-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
