Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960A and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1455MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960A
1.389 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +543%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900A
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
AD107
N16P-GX-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy