NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1880MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700
+373%
8.663 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
Radeon Pro W5700
+438%
964
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
205W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Navi 10
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
