Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Moore Threads MTT S30

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Moore Threads MTT S30

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM MTT S30 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S30 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1300MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
MTT S30 +45%
2.662 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce 900
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
SM Count
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
83.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.325 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.662 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
41.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
Unknown
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
5.2
CUDA
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net