NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1190MHz vs 1033MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+72%
1.828 TFLOPS
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 900
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
902 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
68W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GM107
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
