NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon R7 360E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+13%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360E
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Dec 2015
GeForce 900
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Tobago
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
