NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+1244%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
8192
48
TMUs
512
32
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
450W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
22 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
