NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 75W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
VSA-101
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
-
