NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
424 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+159%
1.389 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
640
Shading Units
216
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
