NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+179%
1.389 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
RV670
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
