Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD FireStream 9170

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM +324%
2.108 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
960
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
RV670
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy