NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 485M
0.883 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
+503%
5.325 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 400M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
36.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
883.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
DG2-256
N12E-GTX-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
332 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
