NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 485M
0.883 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+912%
8.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 400M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
36.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
883.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
AD107
N12E-GTX-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
