NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 102.7GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 465
0.855 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1303%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.7GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
11
SM Count
22
352
Shading Units
2816
44
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
13.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
26.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
855.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
106.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
AD107
GF100-030-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
