NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 vs AMD Radeon R9 280
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 102.7GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 465
0.855 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
+291%
3.344 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.7GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
11
SM Count
-
352
Shading Units
1792
44
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
13.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
26.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
855.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
106.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
Tahiti
GF100-030-A3
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
