NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD P30PH
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM P30PH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
P30PH
+597%
4.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
180W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Polaris 20
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
