NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 143.9GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2815MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (107W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
+714%
5.765 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
107W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 24
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT
(215-135000006)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
