NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (48W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
+76%
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
219W
TDP
48W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
RV730
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
