NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1829%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
22
240
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
88
28
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
219W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
AD107
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
