Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD FirePro W6150M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M +436%
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 200M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
112
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Emerald
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy