Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +253%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
16
216
Shading Units
1024
72
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Pitcairn
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy