NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (120W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+105%
5.437 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
1600
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Cypress
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
