NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+785%
5.437 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
512
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Cayman
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
