NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD FirePro S7150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1770MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+44%
5.437 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Tonga
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
