Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +196%
4.101 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
1536
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.31 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.62 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1385 GFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1385 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
86.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GLM
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy