NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+2528%
4.101 TFLOPS
NVS 4200M
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
1
1536
Shading Units
48
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
N12P-NS1-S-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
