NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M240
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 M240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1335MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+522%
4.101 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M240
0.659 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+1388%
4973
Radeon R5 M240
334
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1030 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
41.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Jet
-
GPU Variant
Jet XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
