Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1845MHz vs 1665MHz)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +74%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1670 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
22
896
Shading Units
1408
56
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy