NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+316%
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
+535%
3566
Radeon R7 250
561
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
