NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+22%
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
